Say there’s been a lot of local advertising lately about universal free school lunch for children who attend public schools between kindergarten to twelfth grade. A casual observer would think this is worthwhile, admirable in fact. Now what if the statement was broken down to reflect various groups in the public schools. Disadvantaged kids whose families earn below a certain income have received free school lunch (as well as added meals like breakfast) since the 1940s. In 1946, Harry S. Truman signed into law the National School Lunch program.
The qualifications for who qualified for the subsidy has undoubtedly been expanded. But the group of children who received subsidized free lunch and those whose families were sending in checks every month to the lunch ladies were not the only two sets. There was another group of kids who were always on the verge of being turned away from eating in the cafeteria. This group belonged to the families who didn’t qualify for free and reduced lunch yet did not choose to pay for their children’s food, leaving their student in an awkward position over the lunch hour.
Occasionally, a wealthy parent or a coach would cover a bunch of unpaid lunch tabs. But universal free lunch definitely takes the plight of the cafeteria workers versus the delinquent parents off the table.
Still, to promote a policy without a proper definition of the groups is misleading. To then claim the moral high ground as if the policy were the first to feed those who are truly disadvantaged is a bit much. It’s an accounting trick. Now, rich families get free lunch too.
Group disclosures please.
Home Economics 